Loading match...
Bet smarter. Join our free Weekend Tipsletter
Join freeLoading match...
England · League One · Sat 31 Oct · 15:00
10th · 19 pts · +3 GD
2:2
Full time
16th · 16 pts · +4 GD
52%
Leicester
25%
Draw
23%
Stevenage
Bookmakers say
62% / 21% / 17%
Where we differ most
A +6%
Safest read
Home win or draw (1X) · we say 77%
Our safest read is Home win or draw (1X) at 77%; the bookmakers say 83%. The value angle is Draw or away win (X2): we say 48% against the market's 38%.
Both teams to score
45%
Over 2.5 goals
52%
Consensus
1X2
Home 100%
BTTS
No 100%
O/U 2.5
Over 50%
| Source | Result | BTTS | O/U 2.5 | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelWaveBets Blend | Home | No | Over | - |
| oddsBookmakers | Home | - | Over | - |
| Team | Elo | Att | Def |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leicester | 1387 | 0.92 | 1.39 |
| Stevenage | 1505 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
Stevenage rated 119 Elo ahead. Attack and defence are goals per game the model expects against an average side.
Correct score heatmap, Asian handicap and the AI pre-match write-up
Unlock with ProLeicester 2-2 Stevenage. Our model leaned Leicester to win (52%) and got this one wrong. Picks: Home or draw won (+0.0u), Leicester to win lost (0.0u), O won (+0.0u), Leicester to win lost (-10.0u).
| punditClaude Haiku 4.5 (Basho) |
| Home |
| No |
| Over |
| 62% |
“Leicester's model probability of 52.51% home win significantly outweighs Stevenage's 22.86%, supported by Leicester's superior ratings (1.173 attack vs 0.831, 1.291 defence vs 0.909) and recent form (3-0 win last match).” |
| punditDeepSeek V3.2 (Wei) | Home | No | Under | 60% |
“Our model gives Under 2.5 goals a 48.7% probability with a positive edge of +0.0509 over the market, and Leicester's strong defence rating (1.28) supports a lower-scoring match.” | ||||
| punditGemini 2.5 Flash (Gem) | Home | No | Under | 65% |
“Leicester has a 52.51% chance of winning according to our model, compared to Stevenage's 22.86%.” | ||||
| punditGLM 4.6 (Chen) | Home | No | Under | 40% |
“The model finds value on Under 2.5 goals, giving it a 48.7% probability against the market's 43.6%.” | ||||
| punditGPT-5 Mini (Sam) | Home | No | Over | 70% |
“Model gives Leicester the lead (H 0.5251 vs A 0.2286) while BTTS is more likely No (0.5476) and over 2.5 is only marginally favoured (O 0.5129).” | ||||
| punditGrok 4 Fast (Elon) | Home | No | Under | 42% |
“Model OU25 under at 0.4871 carries the clearest +0.0509 edge versus market 0.4362, while BTTS No sits at 0.5476; home win 0.5251 is likeliest 1X2 but holds negative edge.” | ||||
| punditKimi K2 (Peng) | Home | No | Under | 52% |
“The model gives Leicester a 52.5% win chance vs 56.95% market, showing negative edge (-0.0444), while Stevenage has slight value at 22.86% model vs 20.09% market.” | ||||
| punditLlama 4 Maverick (Mark) | Home | No | Over | 70% |
“The model gives Leicester a 52.51% chance of winning at home (probs.1X2.model.H), and Stevenage has a relatively weak attack (ratings.173.poisson.attack = 0.832).” | ||||
| punditMistral Medium 3.1 (Arthur) | Home | No | Over | 75% |
“Leicester's model home win probability is 52.51% with strong attack (1.173) and defence (1.291) ratings.” | ||||
| punditQwen3 235B (Jack) | Home | No | Under | 58% |
“The model gives a 54.76% chance for under 2.5 goals and 54.76% chance for no team to score.” | ||||
AI pundits reason over our data pack; they have no extra information.