Loading match...
Bet smarter. Join our free Weekend Tipsletter
Join freeLoading match...
England · National League · Sat 31 Oct · 12:30
15th · 19 pts · -1 GD
2:2
Full time
27th · 4 pts · -1 GD
38%
Forest Green
25%
Draw
37%
Harrogate Town
Bookmakers say
43% / 25% / 32%
Where we differ most
A +6%
Safest read
Home or away win (12) · we say 75%
Our safest read is Home or away win (12) at 75%; the bookmakers say 75%. The value angle is Away win: we say 37% against the market's 32%.
Both teams to score
51%
Over 2.5 goals
58%
Consensus
1X2
Home 92%
BTTS
Yes 64%
O/U 2.5
Under 83%
| Source | Result | BTTS | O/U 2.5 | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelWaveBets Blend | Home | Yes | Over | - |
| oddsBookmakers | Away | - | Over | - |
| Team | Elo | Att | Def |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forest Green | 1406 | 1.02 | 1.80 |
| Harrogate Town | 1511 | 1.33 | 1.30 |
Harrogate Town rated 105 Elo ahead. Attack and defence are goals per game the model expects against an average side.
Correct score heatmap, Asian handicap and the AI pre-match write-up
Unlock with ProForest Green 2-2 Harrogate Town. Our model leaned Forest Green to win (38%) and got this one wrong. The market favoured Harrogate Town to win (38%) and missed it. Picks: H:0 pushed, Home or away lost (0.0u), O won (+0.0u), H:0 pushed.
| punditClaude Haiku 4.5 (Basho) |
| Home |
| Yes |
| Under |
| 62% |
“Forest Green's model probability of 45.23% home win is solid with strong defensive ratings (1.59 defence factor) and better Elo (1418.7 vs 1436.2).” |
| punditDeepSeek V3.2 (Wei) | Home | No | Under | 58% |
“The model gives a slight edge to Under 2.5 goals at 50.69% probability, and Forest Green's recent clean sheet and Harrogate's poor attack (0.617 rating) support a low-scoring game.” | ||||
| punditGemini 2.5 Flash (Gem) | Home | Yes | Under | 65% |
“Forest Green has a 45.23% chance of winning according to our model, compared to Harrogate Town's 34.05%.” | ||||
| punditGLM 4.6 (Chen) | Home | Yes | Under | 55% |
“The model gives Forest Green a 45.23% win probability, supported by their superior league position and strong recent home form.” | ||||
| punditGPT-5 Mini (Sam) | Home | Yes | Under | 72% |
“Model gives Forest Green a 45.23% win chance vs Harrogate 34.05% (draw 20.71%), and Double Chance 12 is 79.29%; BTTS is narrowly Yes at 50.85% while OU2.5 leans Under at 50.69%.” | ||||
| punditGrok 4 Fast (Elon) | Home | Yes | Under | 42% |
“Model gives home 0.4523 and 1X 0.6595 edge over away 0.3405, backed by Forest Green's stronger attack (1.08 vs 0.62) and better recent form.” | ||||
| punditKimi K2 (Peng) | Home | No | Under | 52% |
“Forest Green's home win probability of 45.2% combined with the draw at 20.7% gives a 65.9% chance for 1X double chance.” | ||||
| punditLlama 4 Maverick (Mark) | Home | Yes | Under | 60% |
“The model gives Forest Green (home) a 45.23% chance of winning (H), with a relatively close probability for away win (A) at 34.05%.” | ||||
| punditMistral Medium 3.1 (Arthur) | Home | No | Under | 65% |
“Forest Green's model home win probability is 45.23% vs Harrogate's 34.05%, and their attack (1.08) and defence (1.569) ratings are stronger.” | ||||
| punditQwen3 235B (Jack) | Home | No | Under | 52% |
“Model gives Forest Green a 45.23% chance to win, with Harrogate's weak attack (0.618 DC attack) suggesting low scoring.” | ||||
AI pundits reason over our data pack; they have no extra information.