Loading match...
Bet smarter. Join our free Weekend Tipsletter
Join freeLoading match...
England · National League · Sat 31 Oct · 15:00
18th · 18 pts · -6 GD
3:2
Full time
2nd · 29 pts · +11 GD
24%
Wealdstone
22%
Draw
54%
Southend
Bookmakers say
26% / 23% / 51%
Where we differ most
A +4%
Safest read
Home or away win (12) · we say 79%
Our safest read is Home or away win (12) at 79%; the bookmakers say 77%. The value angle is A:0.75 at 1.91: we say 67%.
Both teams to score
62%
Over 2.5 goals
67%
Consensus
1X2
Away 100%
BTTS
Yes 100%
O/U 2.5
Over 100%
| Source | Result | BTTS | O/U 2.5 | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelWaveBets Blend | Away | Yes | Over | - |
| oddsBookmakers | Away | - | Over | - |
| Team | Elo | Att | Def |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wealdstone | 1394 | 0.90 | 1.64 |
| Southend | 1504 | 1.51 | 1.44 |
Southend rated 110 Elo ahead. Attack and defence are goals per game the model expects against an average side.
Correct score heatmap, Asian handicap and the AI pre-match write-up
Unlock with ProWealdstone 3-2 Southend. Our model leaned Southend to win (54%) and got this one wrong. Picks: A:0.75 pushed, Home or away won (+0.0u), Southend to win lost (0.0u), O won (+0.0u).
| punditDeepSeek V3.2 (Wei) |
| Away |
| Yes |
| Over |
| 62% |
“Southend has a 48.6% win probability, higher ELO (1502 vs 1396), and is 2nd in the table, while Wealdstone is 19th.” |
| punditGemini 2.5 Flash (Gem) | Away | Yes | Over | 70% |
“Southend has a significantly higher model probability of winning at 0.4855 compared to Wealdstone's 0.3291.” | ||||
| punditGLM 4.6 (Chen) | Away | Yes | Over | 65% |
“The model predicts over 2.5 goals at 63.4%, supported by Southend's strong attack rating (1.569) versus Wealdstone's weak defence (1.581).” | ||||
| punditGPT-5 Mini (Sam) | Away | Yes | Over | 80% |
“Model gives Southend a 48.6% chance vs Wealdstone 32.9% (draw 18.5%), and double chance 12 (no draw) is 81.5%, the strongest single probability.” | ||||
| punditKimi K2 (Peng) | Away | Yes | Over | 62% |
“Southend leads the table with 29 points and +12 goal difference versus Wealdstone's 19 points and -7 GD.” | ||||
| punditLlama 4 Maverick (Mark) | Away | Yes | Over | 70% |
“The model gives 61.95% chance of BTTS, and both teams have relatively high attack and defence ratings (Southend: 1.569 attack, 1.395 defence; Wealdstone: 0.928 attack, 1.581 defence), indicating a likely goal-scoring match.” | ||||
| punditMistral Medium 3.1 (Arthur) | Away | Yes | Over | 75% |
“Southend (A) has higher model probability (0.4855) and better form (2W, 3D, 1L) vs Wealdstone (1W, 1D, 4L).” | ||||
| punditQwen3 235B (Jack) | Away | Yes | Over | 72% |
“The model gives a 61.95% chance of both teams scoring, supported by Southend's strong attack (DC attack 1.569) and Wealdstone's weak defence (DC defence 1.581).” | ||||
AI pundits reason over our data pack; they have no extra information.