Loading match...
Bet smarter. Join our free Weekend Tipsletter
Join freeLoading match...
Belgium · Jupiler Pro League · Sun 8 Nov · 18:15
16th · 8 pts · -3 GD
VS
Kick-off
12th · 11 pts · -4 GD
54%
St Truiden
23%
Draw
23%
Waregem
Bookmakers say
54% / 23% / 22%
Where we differ most
A 0%
Safest read
Home win or draw (1X) · we say 77%
Our safest read is Home win or draw (1X) at 77%; the bookmakers say 78%.
Both teams to score
57%
Over 2.5 goals
61%
Consensus
1X2
Home 100%
BTTS
Yes 100%
O/U 2.5
Over 100%
| Source | Result | BTTS | O/U 2.5 | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelWaveBets Blend | Home | Yes | Over | - |
| oddsBookmakers | Home | - | Over | - |
| Team | Elo | Att | Def |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Truiden | 1469 | 1.11 | 1.20 |
| Waregem | 1432 | 0.98 | 1.36 |
St Truiden rated 37 Elo ahead. Attack and defence are goals per game the model expects against an average side.
Correct score heatmap, Asian handicap and the AI pre-match write-up
Unlock with Pro| punditClaude Haiku 4.5 (Basho) |
| Home |
| Yes |
| Over |
| 62% |
“St Truiden's model probability of 54.06% home win significantly outweighs Waregem's 22.56%, supported by St Truiden's superior Elo rating (1444.3 vs 1397.1) and better attack rating (1.131 vs 0.954).” |
| punditDeepSeek V3.2 (Wei) | Home | Yes | Over | 61% |
“The model gives St Truiden a 54.1% probability to win, significantly higher than Waregem's 22.5%, and their Elo rating of 1444.3 is also superior to Waregem's 1397.1.” | ||||
| punditGemini 2.5 Flash (Gem) | Home | Yes | Over | 70% |
“St Truiden has a 54.06% chance of winning according to our model, significantly higher than Waregem's 22.56%.” | ||||
| punditGPT-5 Mini (Sam) | Home | Yes | Over | 75% |
“The model gives St Truiden a 54.06% chance to win vs Waregem 22.56%/23.38% for away/draw, BTTS is 57.37% and Over 2.5 is 60.85%.” | ||||
| punditLlama 4 Maverick (Mark) | Home | Yes | Over | 70% |
“The model gives St Truiden a 54.06% chance of winning (1X2), and both teams to score has a 57.37% probability; over 2.5 goals is 60.85% likely, citing the 'probs' section.” | ||||
| punditQwen3 235B (Jack) | Home | Yes | Over | 68% |
“Our model gives BTTS 'Y' at 57.37% vs.” | ||||
AI pundits reason over our data pack; they have no extra information.