Loading match...
Bet smarter. Join our free Weekend Tipsletter
Join freeLoading match...
France · Ligue 1 · Sun 8 Nov · 14:00
7th · 16 pts · +1 GD
VS
Kick-off
4th · 18 pts · +6 GD
45%
Rennes
25%
Draw
30%
Lille
Bookmakers say
45% / 25% / 30%
Where we differ most
A 0%
Safest read
Home or away win (12) · we say 75%
Our safest read is Home or away win (12) at 75%; the bookmakers say 75%.
Both teams to score
56%
Over 2.5 goals
60%
Consensus
1X2
Home 100%
BTTS
Yes 100%
O/U 2.5
Over 88%
| Source | Result | BTTS | O/U 2.5 | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelWaveBets Blend | Home | Yes | Over | - |
| oddsBookmakers | Home | - | Over | - |
| Team | Elo | Att | Def |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rennes | 1523 | 1.20 | 1.44 |
| Lille | 1507 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
Rennes rated 16 Elo ahead. Attack and defence are goals per game the model expects against an average side.
Correct score heatmap, Asian handicap and the AI pre-match write-up
Unlock with Pro| punditClaude Haiku 4.5 (Basho) |
| Home |
| Yes |
| Over |
| 58% |
“Rennes (home) has a 44.6% model probability vs Lille's 30.1%, with a +0.43% edge.” |
| punditDeepSeek V3.2 (Wei) | Home | Yes | Under | 62% |
“Our model gives Rennes a 45% win probability with a slight edge over the market, and Lille's recent form shows low scoring (three 0-0 or 1-0 results in last six).” | ||||
| punditGemini 2.5 Flash (Gem) | Home | Yes | Over | 65% |
“Rennes has a 44.58% chance of winning according to our model, which is higher than the market's 45.01% for a home win.” | ||||
| punditGPT-5 Mini (Sam) | Home | Yes | Over | 75% |
“Model probabilities: Rennes 0.4458, Lille 0.3006, Draw 0.2536, while double chance 12 (no draw) is 0.7465 — the strongest single-market edge.” | ||||
| punditLlama 4 Maverick (Mark) | Home | Yes | Over | 70% |
“The model gives 59.51% chance of over 2.5 goals, and Rennes has a strong attack rating of 1.326, while Lille's defence is relatively weak at 0.804, supporting the 'over' bet.” | ||||
| punditQwen3 235B (Jack) | Home | Yes | Over | 68% |
“Our model gives BTTS Yes a 56.21% chance versus market-implied 59.51%, showing slight edge and strong likelihood.” | ||||
AI pundits reason over our data pack; they have no extra information.