Loading match...
Bet smarter. Join our free Weekend Tipsletter
Join freeLoading match...
Scotland · Championship · Sat 7 Nov · 15:00
14th · 0 pts · -3 GD
0:1
Full time
1st · 28 pts · +11 GD
12%
Queen's Park
18%
Draw
69%
Partick
Bookmakers say
11% / 18% / 71%
Where we differ most
H 1%
Safest read
Draw or away win (X2) · we say 88%
Our safest read is Draw or away win (X2) at 88%; the bookmakers say 89%.
Both teams to score
45%
Over 2.5 goals
58%
Consensus
1X2
Away 100%
BTTS
No 100%
O/U 2.5
Under 75%
| Source | Result | BTTS | O/U 2.5 | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| modelWaveBets Blend | Away | No | Over | - |
| oddsBookmakers | Away | - | Over | - |
| Team | Elo | Att | Def |
|---|---|---|---|
| Queen's Park | 1389 | - | - |
| Partick | 1486 | - | - |
Partick rated 97 Elo ahead. Attack and defence are goals per game the model expects against an average side.
Correct score heatmap, Asian handicap and the AI pre-match write-up
Unlock with ProQueen's Park 0-1 Partick. Our model leaned Partick to win (69%) and called it right. Picks: Both teams to score: No won (+0.0u), Partick to win won (+0.0u), O lost (0.0u), Partick to win won (+3.5u).
| punditClaude Haiku 4.5 (Basho) |
| Away |
| No |
| Under |
| 58% |
“Partick (away) has a 39.4% win probability vs Queen's Park's 32.0%, supported by Partick's superior Elo rating (1498.5 vs 1420.8) and stronger recent form (3W-1D-2L vs 0W-0D-2L).” |
| punditDeepSeek V3.2 (Wei) | Away | No | Under | 62% |
“The model strongly favors Under 2.5 goals at 60.9% probability, and Partick's superior form and league-leading position support a tight, low-scoring away win.” | ||||
| punditGemini 2.5 Flash (Gem) | Away | No | Under | 70% |
“Partick has a significantly higher Elo rating of 1498.5 compared to Queen's Park's 1420.8, and our model gives them a 39.42% chance of winning.” | ||||
| punditGPT-5 Mini (Sam) | Away | No | Under | 72% |
“Model gives double-chance 12 (no draw) probability 0.7136, higher than single-win probs (Away 0.3942, Home 0.3195) and BTTS No 0.5457.” | ||||
| punditLlama 4 Maverick (Mark) | Away | No | Under | 60% |
“The model gives away win (A: 0.3942, H: 0.3195, D: 0.2864) but under 2.5 goals is more likely (U: 0.6093, O: 0.3907); Partick's form is stronger.” | ||||
| punditQwen3 235B (Jack) | Away | No | Under | 68% |
“The model gives a 54.57% chance for under 2.5 goals and 54.57% for BTTS no, aligning with Queen's Park's low rating (1420.8 ELO) and poor form (2 losses in last 2).” | ||||
AI pundits reason over our data pack; they have no extra information.